No. 20-5261
IFP
Tags: court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process eyewitness-identification identification-testimony motion-to-suppress reliability-standard suggestive-identification suggestive-procedure totality-of-circumstances witness-reliability
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Does under the totality of the circumstance, is the in-court identification reliable even though the confrontation procedure was suggestive?
2) Did the Court fo. Apppeals reversibly err in denying the defendent's motion to suppress the identification testimony of the complaining witness obtained after a single photo displayed to that witness?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the in-court identification meet the reliability standard under the totality of the circumstances, even though the confrontation procedure was suggestive?
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-06-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 4, 2020)
Attorneys
Michael Fred Houston
Michael F. Houston — Petitioner