AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether the Florida Supreme Court and the Third District Court of Appeal of Florida ("the Third DCA") violated the due process protection of the 5th and 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by allowing the respondent AMERIPORT, LTD., ET AL. Under Section 362 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, the stay begins at the moment the bankruptcy petition is filed. No action should be taken to obtain possession of property of the debtor. 11 U.S.C. 362(a)(3).
Whether an entity that is willfully retaining possession of property that it seized after the bankruptcy petition was filed, and in which the debtor has an interest, violates 11 U.S.C. 362(a)(3) if it fails to return that property to the debtor immediately.
Whether the Florida Supreme Court and the Third District Court of Appeal of Florida violated the due process protection of the 5th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution by refusing to grant disqualification when there are objective reasons to question its impartiality in foreclosure appeals raising this same fraudulent misconduct?
Whether the Florida Supreme Court and the Third District Court of Appeal of Florida violated the due process protection of the 5th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution