DID THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN AND THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ERRONEOUSLY DENIED MR. BURNSIDE'S REQUEST FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IN THIS HABEAS CORPUS CASE WHERE JURISTS OF REASON COULD CLEARLY DEBATE WHETHER MR. BURNSIDE'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED AND HE IS ENTITLED TO A NEW TRIAL BASED ON NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE, WHERE THE PROSECUTOR KNOWINGLY USED PERJURED TESTIMONY FROM LEAH WATSON, WHOSE TESTIMONY WAS BASED ON THREATS AND INTIMIDATION; AND THAT JUDGE FARAH'S FACTUAL FINDINGS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO A PRESUMPTION OF CORRECTNESS?

Whether Mr. Burnside's due-process rights were violated and he is entitled to a new trial based on newly-discovered-evidence where the prosecutor knowingly used perjured-testimony