No. 20-5230
Arthur Lopez v. Newport Beach Police Department, et al.
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the seizure and warrantless search of a vehicle and its contents, including a cell phone, violates the Fourth Amendment rights of the vehicle's occupants
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2020-11-17
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-10-30
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2020-10-05
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2020-09-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-10
Waiver of right of respondent Joshua Vincelet to respond filed.
2020-07-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2020)
2020-02-25
Application (19A942) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 5, 2020.
2020-02-14
Application (19A942) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 6, 2020 to July 5, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Arthur Lopez
Arthur Lopez — Petitioner
Joshua Vincelet