No. 20-5221
Arthur James Martin v. Florida
IFP
Tags: brady-violation capital-trial criminal-procedure cumulative-error cumulative-error-analysis giglio-violation ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction-relief strickland-test trial-counsel
Key Terms:
Takings DueProcess Punishment Privacy
Takings DueProcess Punishment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether trial counsel's failure to investigate and present evidence that significantly undermines the State's case is deficient performance that results in prejudice?
2. Whether a state court is required to conduct a cumulative error analysis of violations of Brady, Giglio, and/or Strickland?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether trial counsel's failure to investigate and present evidence that significantly undermines the State's case is deficient performance that results in prejudice?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-09-01
Reply of petitioner Arthur Martin filed.
2020-08-28
Brief of respondent State of Florida in opposition filed.
2020-07-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2020)
Attorneys
Arthur Martin
State of Florida
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent