No. 20-5197

Lamar Moore, aka Kane v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: career-offender-status criminal-penalties due-process factual-findings ineffective-assistance-of-counsel interstate-commerce plea-waiver second-amendment sentencing-enhancement sentencing-enhancements
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) Shouldn't Moore's Plea and conviction under Count one be Vackted in light
of Rehaif V.united states, 139 s.ct.2191 (2o1), Where the indictment failed
to allege Moore's Knowledge of his s
status as a prohibited person, and

2) DiD Moore receive the Ineffective assistance of Counsel When he was
advised to Withdraw his Meritorous Challenge to his Career offender
Status?

3) Shouldn't Moore's Sentence be Vacated where the district court
findings of facts Supporting the imposed enhancements?

4) whether 18 U.siC. 924a) Provides for criminal Penalties
To felons Who possess firearms in Interstate Commerce
absent proof that they knew of their felon status, or of
The firearm's Movement in Interstate Commerce?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

should-moore's-plea-and-conviction-be-vacated

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2020)

Attorneys

Lamar Moore
Lamar Moore — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent