1. Would the State of Texas cause a fundamental miscarriage of justice violating the United States Fourteenth Amendment by refusing to overturn the criminal sentence due to the evidence produced at a subsequent civil trial of actually innocent of the criminal act because he lacked mental capacity?

2. Does the State of Texas commit fraud by maintaining two definitions of insanity, criminal and civil where both are relevant to the crime but not germane to each other, being inapposite in their respected conclusions, one is forbidden in the criminal proceedings though it later uses the crime to prove a lack of freewill making the natural colloquy suggest that the conviction of the crime could not have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt in contravention to the United States Fourteenth Amendment?

3. To work effectively, it is important that society's criminal process "satisfy the appearance of justice," does the State of Texas violate this principle infringing upon the United States Fourteenth Amendment?

Would the State of Texas cause a fundamental miscarriage of justice violating the United States Fourteenth Amendment by refusing to overturn the criminal sentence due to the evidence produced at a subsequent civil trial of actually innocent of the criminal act because he lacked mental capacity?