No. 20-5154
Jorge Armando Herrera Salguero v. California
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability closing-argument credibility due-process habeas habeas-corpus prosecutorial-misconduct witness-credibility
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is the Ninth Circuit's denial of a COA on Salguero's prosecutorial misconduct claim contrary to this Court's jurisprudence?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit's denial of a COA on Salguero's prosecutorial-misconduct claim is contrary to this Court's jurisprudence
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-23
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
2020-07-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 24, 2020)
Attorneys
California
Lise Jacobson — Office of the CA Attorney General, Respondent
Jorge Armando Herrera Salguero
Mark R. Drozdowski — Office of the Federal Public Defend, Petitioner