Impeted within Ninth circuit court case No. 19-168s in cnTonction with Ninth circuit curt case N8. 19-159s2 denonstrated that State District curt caseNo. Ca2840 i 1 Nevada Suprene Court (ase N8.d7 should have bun reviewed en banc 35 requbsted. of. The docrine of impeted liability. Prswant to united states Suprene Curt Bule 1 d(): appeats has decided an inpdrtant guestion sf federal law that has not been, but should be settled by this Court, o has derided an inportast federal question in a way that onflicts with relevsnt decisious of this Cowrt. Therefore whether the Petitioner's Application for a Appeshbility constitutional Violation even sfter following the then astoblished poths of Habers corpus and thereafter 405.C.1983.

Whether the Petitioner's application for a certificate of appealability was improperly denied