Whether the resolution of Petitioner's Brady Violation claim by the State courts resulted in a decision that was contrary to or involved an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law as determined by the U.S. Supreme Court, in violation of the Fifth Amendment.

(2) Whether the resolution of Petitioner's Brady Violation claim by the State courts resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented to the State court proceedings, in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

(3) Whether the State court remedy of Writ of Habeas Corpus afforded to Petitioner was seriously inadequate in that the State court proceeding did not afford Petitioner a full and fair adjudication of federal questions raised by affording Petitioner an evidentiary hearing, as promulgated by this Court in Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293 (1963), in violation of the Fifth Amendment.

Whether the resolution of petitioner's Brady violation claim by the state courts resulted in a decision that was contrary to or involved an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law as determined by the U.S. Supreme Court, in violation of the 14th Amendment