No. 20-5121
Brayan Gutierrez-Diaz v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appointed-counsel criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment interrogation miranda-warning right-to-counsel self-incrimination
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether and to what extent a mistranslated Miranda warning, which does not reasonably convey the right to appointed counsel during interrogation, fails to protect a defendant's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when the resulting confession is later used to convict the defendant?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether and to what extent a mistranslated Miranda warning, which does not reasonably convey the right to appointed counsel during interrogation, fails to protect a defendant's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when the resulting confession is later used to convict the defendant?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-07-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 20, 2020)
Attorneys
Brayan Gutierrez-Diaz
Kristi A. Hughes — Law Office of Kristi A. Hughes, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent