I. Did The State Prosecutor Violate Petitioner's Constitutional Right To Due Process By Presenting Known False Testimony And By Using Inconsistent Theories In Co-Defendant's Trial And Petitioner's Trial?

II. Did The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals Error In Adopting Michigan Appellate Court's Determination of Facts?

III. Was Petitioner Denied VI Amendment Rights To Effective Assistance Of Counsel Under Strickland Law, Where Trial Counsel Failed To Present Multiple (5) Available Defenses?

IV. Did The Trial Court Abuse It's Discretion, Denying Petitioner's State An Party Testimonial Hearsay, where Adverse witness was Available? And Was Due Process Violated, Allowing Multiple Additional Jury Instructions Relieving The Prosecution of It's Burden To Prove Every Element of First Degree Murder Conviction Beyond A Reasonable Doubt?

V. Did The Prosecutor Perpetrate Fraud Upon The Court (Perjury), Denying Petitioner Due Process of Rights?

VI. Was Petitioner Denied Due Process Under Brady Law, Where The Prosecutor Suppressed Multiple Exculpatory And Impeachment Evidence?

VII. Was Petitioner's Due Process Rights Violated, Where Trial Court Further Abused It's Discretion Failing To Estop The Prosecutor Prejudicial Actions?

VIII. Did The State Court Illegally Obtain Jurisdiction Depriving Liberty, Trying And Convicting Petitioner Violating 4th & 14th Amendment, Where The Criminal Complaint Was Insufficient And No Probable Cause Existed? And Was Petitioner Denied Counsel At Arraignment (Critical Stage under Cronic Law) And Did Counsel Render Ineffective under Strickland Law Once Appointed?

IX. Was Petitioner Denied Equal Protection Under 14th Amendment, With "Open Murder" Statute?

X. Was Petitioner Denied Effective Assistance Of Counsel Under Strickland Law to Petitioner On His Appeal of Rights?

Whether the State of Michigan violated Petitioner's constitutional right to due process by presenting known false testimony and by using inconsistent theories to convict Petitioner at trial