Whether the trial court ever acquired subject matter jurisdiction based on the evidence presented in the commitment in the State of Virginia crime scene as being based on the face of the record without any address ever being presented as required by Due process of law?

3) Whether the trial court was presented evidence of Probable cause to arrest try, convict, and sentence Whitter and never acknowledging this claim for Sup.Ct. Va. e.3 in the Habeas corpus petition per Due process of law?

4) Whether Whitter's asserted Va. Sup. Ct.R. 1 is his Habeas corpus petition contrary to respondent Clarke's assertion that it did not thus the Habeas trial court by Clarke?

5) Whether officers of the Court committed fraud upon rights as it was an assault on the integrity of the Court's judicial process itself? and denied U.S. Const.

6) Whether the trial court represented satisfactorily to the judge, Partial and tidy, and that the public done is cause that a reasonable probability that, but for their error's the results would have been different?

7) Whether the trial court in Case no. Ch19-336-Whitter v. Clarke committed suable error either it violated their procedure in requires?

8) Whether Due process of law right to be heard under the U.S. Const. 14th Amend was violated and prejudice resulted when the Sup. Ct. Va. Clerk of Court handed down the final order of Whitter Habeas corpus petition in sting of Sp V. R. 5.1?

9) An exceptional Question of Importance questions at claim #6?

Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated based on the alleged denial of due process and free speech