No. 20-5105
David Scott Temple v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fourteenth-amendment guilty-plea louisiana-constitution plea-bargaining sixth-amendment standard-of-review strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Reasonable jurists would determine that Mr. Temple was denied effective assistance of counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and
2. Reasonable Jurists would argue that the trial court abused its discretion in its acceptance of Mr. Temple's guilty plea.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Mr. Temple denied effective assistance of counsel?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-17
Waiver of right of respondent Vannoy, Warden to respond filed.
2020-07-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 17, 2020)
Attorneys
David Scott Temple
David Scott Temple — Petitioner
Vannoy, Warden
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent