Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment imposes upon the State an affirmative duty of care and protection to confined persons held in state custody from ex cetera of arbitrary and abusive government policy, or custom through acquiescence to a course of conduct by its police, mandated by statute not authorized by law, the State or Federal regulators are so well settled as to in virtually constitute law which was cause and in fact of convicted persons serious injury by deliberately retard actual knowledge is created danger by government state actor to act, uscience to prohibit oppressive custom of practice and is distributed to a remedy under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for grants cause of action object of authorized by law so well settled as to constitute law.

Whether the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment imposes upon the State an affirmative duty of care and protection to connected persons in State custody from the arbitrary and abusive conduct of government officials, where the State through its acquiescence to a course of conduct by its officials, that was not authorized by law, creates a custom or practice that is arbitrary and oppressive in a constitutional sense