No. 20-5082

Robert Deane Schwartz v. Raymond Madden, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: affirmative-defense certificate-of-appealability due-process fourteenth-amendment habeas habeas-corpus jury-instruction jury-instructions
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the Ninth Circuit err for failing to grant a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) on petitioner's claim that the state trial court's failure to instruct the jury on his affirmative defense violated his right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment because reasonable jurists would find the claim's merits debatable?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Ninth Circuit err for failing to grant a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) on petitioner's claim that the state trial court's failure to instruct the jury on his affirmative defense violated his right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment because reasonable jurists would find the claim's merits debatable?

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 14, 2020)

Attorneys

Robert Deane Schwartz
Tracy CasadioOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner