Where is the jurisdiction in U.S.A. over a corruptive arbitration? In this most outrageous arbitration, a neutral arbitrator and the defendants' counsels dismiss a medical malpractice claim under color of law via their 989 ex parte conspiratorial emails, a fake [Demand for Arbitration], the concealment of the material medical records, suppression down her expert report, and a torturous deposition against an indigence handicapped victim of their malpractice, plus all tricks compiled in an encyclopedia of frauds.

Is it legal for those fraudsters and conspirators to dump their victim to Med-Cal funded by federation to encroach public interest for their personal monetary gain?

Shall the [Opinion] of Sixth Court of Appeal of State of California, confirmed by Supreme Court of State of California, "But since an arbitration award is the product of private arrangement, not state action, arbitration proceedings do not implicate the right to due process." set up a precedent case above 14th Amendment of U.S. constitutional?

Shall a corruptive arbitration in undue means under color of law be justified by a private arbitration agreement?

Both 9 U.S. Code 10 and CCP 1286.2 have vested the jurisdiction over the corruptive arbitration in U.S. and CA courts. It is deemed all courts evaded their authority and hope that U.S. Supreme Court set up a case law to guide them.

Have Federal District Court and Circuit Court of Appeal no constitutional jurisdiction over those conspiratorial frauds in undue means under "Rooker-Feldman Doctrine"?

Where is the jurisdiction in U.S.A. over a corruptive arbitration?