No. 20-5067

James A. Riggs v. Jay Cassady, Warden

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals appeals-process civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review post-conviction-relief procedural-deficiency standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

grounds that the th Cireuit Count displayed a
blatoN abusE of thER eNumeRAted PoWeR
being
INconstant with the loth Constitional
AmendmeNT
Resulting in a Weongful
Exasturbated outcome.
5th and 6oth Constitional Amenc ments
Rights
upon the negligence of the States by way of failuee
to provide Notification of
four separate crutial
hearings.
In accoridunce with the constition Amencment14
any and all appeats in which I made in request
to dismiss all charges to dismiss all charges
or at the very
least grant a new trial
due to any of the 92 merrits brought forth
against me at my original trial.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the 4th Circuit Court displayed an abuse of its enumerated power, in contravention of the 10th Amendment

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-11
Waiver of right of respondent Jay Cassady to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 14, 2020)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

James Riggs
James A. Riggs — Petitioner
Jay Cassady
Julie Marie Blake — Office of the Missouri Attorney General, Respondent