No. 20-5058
Randy Estevez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process felony-enhancement firearm-possession jury-instructions jury-unanimity sentencing sentencing-reasonableness u-s-sentencing-guidelines unanimity
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the district court erred in not instructing the jury that it
should be unanimous on the date and location of his alleged
possession of the firearm?
2. Whether there was insufficient evidence to support the four-level
enhancement under U.S.S.G. §2K2.1(B)(6) that Estevez used a
firearm in connection with another felony?
3. Whether the sentence of 100 months incarceration was
substantively unreasonable?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in not instructing the jury that it should be unanimous on the date and location of his alleged possession of the firearm?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Randy Estevez
Bruce Robert Bryan — Bruce R. Bryan, Esq., Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent