Whether the district court's decision when imposing sentence that a defendant failed to sufficiently justify a "reduction" from the Sentencing Guidelines range (1) placed excessive weight on the advisory sentencing guidelines and impermissibly treated the guidelines as presumptively reasonable, and/or (2) impermissibly treated as the presumptive sentence from which to consider a variance or departure the original sentence by a different judge that the Court of Appeals had previously vacated, and thus committed reversible procedural error when it imposed at resentencing an identical sentence of 360 months imprisonment.

Whether the district court's decision when imposing sentence improperly treated the sentencing guidelines