whether thE District cauat oR count oF aepeal Aeey thE
Application of Law because thE videotape withbeld the
shaw thE paisn Guaad loteracted with the petitien And
because it ne Evidince to suppeat mantn had inteaacted
with this Guard mean it ae Fvidinct that sueficent
to suppiatedmartia guilty viadict

Whether the district court of appeals properly applied the standards of Brady v. Maryland and Giglio v. United States in evaluating the petitioner's claims