No. 20-5046

In Re Daniel H. Jones

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2020-07-13
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure extraordinary-writs judicial-review mandamus prohibition sovereign-immunity state-law supervisory-power writ-of-prohibition
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-12-04 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

I.
WOULD THE ISSUANCE OF A, WRIT OF PROHIBITION
AND/OR MANDAMUS BE JUSTIFIED WHERE THE
PETITIONER' S CIRCUMSTANCES COULD AID THIS
COURT IN SUPERVISING AN APPELLATE COURT 'S
JURISDICTION?

II.
WOULD THIS COURT BE JUSTIFIED GRANTING
EltHER WRIT OF PROHIBITION OR MANDAMUS
WHERE ADEQUATE RELIEF CANNOT BE OBTAINED
IN ANY OTHER FORM OR FROM ANY OTHER COURT?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Would the issuance of a writ of prohibition and/or mandamus be justified where the petitioner's circumstances could aid this court in supervising an appellate court's jurisdiction?

Docket Entries

2020-12-07
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2020-11-17
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-10-21
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2020-10-05
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2020-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-01
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 12, 2020)

Attorneys

Daniel Jones
Daniel Henderson Jones — Petitioner