No. 20-5036
Jermond Perry v. Jeffrey Woods, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: batson-challenge batson-v-kentucky equal-protection habeas-corpus jury-selection peremptory-challenges peremptory-strikes racial-discrimination sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Was counsel's objection at the moment
the pattern emerged sufficient to warrant
a full Batson inquiry withrespect to all strikes in the alleged pattern?
II. When a court allows earlier peremptory
challenges in a pattern of strikes to stand
without taking remedial action; does it
potentially endorse purposeful discrimination
contrary to Batson?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was counsel's objection at the moment the pattern emerged sufficient to warrant a full Batson inquiry with respect to all strikes in the alleged pattern?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-11
Waiver of right of respondent Jeffrey Woods, Warden to respond filed.
2020-07-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 19, 2020)
Attorneys
Jeffrey Woods, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Jermond Perry
Jermond Perry — Petitioner