(A) The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit relied on HECK v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, the usual part of malicious prosecution and its favorable determination. The Seventh Circuit held that Petitioner was to be given relief under one theory. Petitioner firmly challenged that the tort of abuse of process should have been employed when Petitioner's Breach of Contract lawsuit was willingly converted to HK §3, because of fraud in probable trust and in the initiation of the Interstate Agreement on Detainees Act (the "X-Act"), extradition process, whereby SMITH v. PLAZAK (citation omitted) and CMSVCHNG LIVESTOCK Co. v. BUREBA (citation omitted) SLAUGHTER HOUSE to., 100 U.S. (citation omitted), therein this Court in HECK, Supra; with Justice Souter Contumacy believes that this unique situation has not been settled by this Court's come.

(B) The Seventh Circuit ruled that Petitioner did present a demonstrated and federal question (citation omitted) as precedent MILK v. ABACAS, (citation omitted). But 12 Id. (citation omitted), commands that even the Seventh Circuit had a mandatory duty to enforce the FCAB and not exercise discretion to ignore, a lack of according to CALIFORNIA v. LEACH, (citation omitted) (citation omitted). Should writs of mandamus and prohibition had issued, Court been settled by this US of fake Sixth has never since.

(C) Petitioner fully exhausted laws state remedies were looked state, federal, and Constitution at law. Was the Seventh Circuit contrary to this Court and HECK's Seventh Circuit in HECK v. HUMPHREY, US. (citation omitted), when it failed to reclassify Petitioner's Breach of Contract lawsuit converted to §1983, to a habeas corpus action?

(D) Petitioner asserts that the IABA is mandatory U.S. (citation omitted), and "Complaint" refers to criminal charges pending against a prisoner (citation omitted), that extradition is "invalid where receiving state initiates extradition proceeding without complying with its own extradition statute" (citation omitted). The Seventh Circuit concedes that an arrestee could not have been convicted if police had been acting without probable cause (citation omitted). It's US. (citation omitted), and this Court declared "a defendant may not be prosecuted in violation of the terms of an extradition treaty" (citation omitted).

Malicious prosecution - favorable termination, abuse of process, Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, extradition, mandamus, habeas corpus