No. 20-5012

In Re Jeanette Woolsey-Ross

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2020-07-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-challenge criminal-statute due-process equal-protection federal-state-laws judicial-interpretation jurisdiction legislative-intent standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

Should a writ of Prohibition be issued under the U.S. Supreme Court Writ of Certiorari in this case or Writ of Mandamus, I also stated or whatever the U.S. Supreme Court Deems to prohibit the Virginia child Support Enforcement?

What writ Does the U.S. Supreme Court Deem Just and proper to Issue to the Winchester Virginia Court Prohibiting them From Adjudicating educating or otherwise Woolsley Weekly concerns or otherwise.

Is there a writ that can Be issued to prohibit JUST THE FACT THAT THIS MAJOR is a complete nullity, which is on appeal in every Court through writ of certiorari, But Not Removed and are Currently in the appellent and Case Court Currently Elevated and continues to Be subject to child Support?

What Constitutional Rights Federal, Interstate laws are Violated when Neither the mother/father and that parent is not one the Law of Jurisdiction who is No longer Subject to the Legal Language of Non-custodial parent or is also can as Respondent of Social security Disability, Also where No child Domiciles parent, No parent Domiciles in the Jurisdiction and Current and the child support enforcement Amounts Ennervedo weekly Support, but side of their Legal child law taking the Oath they took to uphold The United States Rights protected Absolute Legal Language Non Custodial parent, Non-custodial parent, If a Current creates and Adjudications and Furthermore Does so knowingly?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-08
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 10, 2020)

Attorneys

Jeanette Woolsey-Ross
Jeanette Woolsey-Ross — Petitioner