WHETHER THE COURT'S RULING THAT CELL PHONE TOWER LOCATION DATA AND INTERPRETATION MAY BE PRESENTED BY AN UNQUALIFIED LAY WITNESS WHO IS UNABLE TO ANSWER SUBSTANTIVE QUESTIONS ON CROSS-EXAMINATION WITHOUT PARROTING, VIOLATES THE RIGHT OF CONFRONTATION AND CROSS-EXAMINATION ESTABLISHED BY THE 67 AMENDMENT.

WHETHER THE COURT'S RULING FINDING A LACK OF STATE ACTION INA PREJUDICIAL PRETRIAL IDENTIFICATION INVOLVING ADMITTED POLICE "RECRUITMENT" OF LAY PERSONS CONTRAVENES THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT.

whether-the-court's-ruling-that-cell-phone-tower-location-data-and-interpretation-may-be-presented-by-an-unqualified-lay-witness-who-is-unable-to-answer-substantive-questions-on-cross-examination-without-parroting-violates-the-right-of-confrontation-and-cross-examination-established-by-the-6th-amendment