No. 20-479
David C. Shinn v. Ryan Robert Baker
Tags: adversarial-system appellate-procedure case-transformation civil-procedure gvr judicial-restraint ninth-circuit party-presentation sineneng-smith summary-reversal
Latest Conference:
2021-04-16
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether this Court should reverse the decision below under Sineneng-Smith.
2. Whether this Court should grant, vacate and remand in light of Sineneng-Smith.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision violated the principle of party presentation
Docket Entries
2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-23
Reply of petitioner David Shinn filed. (Distributed)
2021-03-04
Brief of respondent Ryan Robert Baker in opposition filed. (Mar. 16, 2021)
2021-01-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 8, 2021. See Rule 30.1.
2020-12-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 6, 2021 to March 6, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-12-07
Response Requested. (Due January 6, 2021)
2020-11-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.
2020-10-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 12, 2020)
Attorneys
David Shinn
Drew Curtis Ensign — Office of the Attorney General, Petitioner
Ryan Robert Baker
Jeffrey James Rogers — Law Office of Jeffrey J Rogers, Respondent
Stacy E. Scheff — Law Office of Stacy Scheff, Respondent