Whether the Government's prosecution of the Petitioner in this case violated his Sixth Amendment right to a Speedy Trial and/or his Fifth Amendment right to Due Process because of the inordinate pre-indictment delay, the prejudicial post-indictment delay, and the extraordinary post-verdict delay in sentencing?

If a Judge merely thinks about the Speedy Trial Act factors in his own mind, but does not set forth his findings in the record, does that satisfy this Court's standard under Zedner v. United States, 547 U.S. 489 (2006) and United States v. Bloate, 559 U.S. 196 (2010)?

Did the Petitioner become the "accused" for the purposes of the Speedy Trial Clause as described in Marion, when a magistrate judge issued a search warrant allegedly based on "probable cause" on April 19, 2010 and May 25, 2011?

Whether the Government's prosecution of the Petitioner violated his Sixth Amendment right to a Speedy Trial and/or his Fifth Amendment right to Due Process