No. 20-395
Timothy C. Rote v. Max Zweizig
Response Waived
Tags: arbitrability-standard arbitration-enforcement employment-agreement federal-arbitration-act free-speech-retaliation non-signatory non-signatory-arbitration oregon-uniform-arbitration-act post-employment-retaliation prior-adjudication waiver waiver-doctrine
Latest Conference:
2020-11-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the district court erred and exceeded its authority under the FAA and OUAA by refusing to compel arbitration (finding waiver and non-signatory
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred and exceeded its authority under the FAA and OUAA by refusing to compel arbitration (finding waiver and non-signatory) as mandated under the employment contract (previously adjudicated by the New Jersey State Court which compelled arbitration of post-employment retaliation claims against non-signatory petitioner)?
Docket Entries
2020-11-16
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
2020-10-14
Waiver of right of respondent Max Zweizig to respond filed.
2020-09-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 26, 2020)
Attorneys
Max Zweizig
Shenoa Payne — Shenoa Payne Attorney at Law PC, Respondent
Timothy C. Rote
Timothy C. Rote — Petitioner