No. 20-38
Arkansas v. Charles Gresham, et al.
Tags: administrative-law agency-discretion experimental-projects health-benefits health-policy medicaid medicaid-expansion secretary-of-health-and-human-services social-welfare statutory-interpretation work-requirements
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
(distributed 2 times)
Related Cases:
20-37
(Vide)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Secretary's approval of the Arkansas Works Amendment was lawful.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Secretary's approval of the Arkansas Works Amendment was lawful
Docket Entries
2022-05-20
Judgment Issued
2021-02-22
CIRCULATED.
2021-02-08
Record from the U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts are electronic and located on Pacer.
2021-02-08
Record from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.
2021-02-04
Record requested from the U.S.C.A. D.C. Circuit.
2020-11-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-04
Reply of petitioner State of Arkansas filed. (Distributed)
2020-11-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020.
2020-08-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 16, 2020.
2020-08-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 17, 2020 to October 16, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-07-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 17, 2020)
Attorneys
Charles Gresham, et al.
Ian Heath Gershengorn — Jenner & Block, Respondent
Nebraska Appleseed
Jaclyn Niccole Warr — Stinson LLP, Amicus
State of Arkansas
Nicholas Jacob Bronni — Solicitor General of Arkansas, Petitioner