No. 20-355
Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., et al.
Tags: 35-usc-287 damages federal-circuit infringement-notice marking-statute notice-of-infringement patent-act patent-damages patent-marking statutory-interpretation willful-infringement
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that "notified of the infringement" and "such notice" under §287(a) refer only to communications from the patent owner.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that 'notified of the infringement' and 'such notice' under §287(a) refer only to communications from the patent owner
Docket Entries
2020-11-10
Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
2020-11-05
Motion to dismiss in accordance with Rule 46.1 filed.
2020-10-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 7, 2020.
2020-10-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 28, 2020 to December 7, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-09-28
Response Requested. (Due October 28, 2020)
2020-09-28
Brief amicus curiae of Lambeth Magnetic Structures, LLC filed.
2020-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-17
Waiver of right of respondents Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2020-09-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 19, 2020)
Attorneys
Arctic Cat Inc.
John Caviness O'Quinn — Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Petitioner
Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., et al.
Louis W. Tompros — Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Respondent
Lambeth Magnetic Structures, LLC
Denise Marie De Mory — Bunsow De Mory LLP, Amicus