No. 20-339
Jason Winer v. Coralys Negron, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure consumer-protection creditor-definition creditor-status de-facto-dealer district-court-jurisdiction state-law-claims Supplemental-jurisdiction unfair-trade-practices
Latest Conference:
2020-10-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Did the District Court err in exercising supplemental jurisdiction over the Plaintiffs state law claims when the Defendant-Jason Winer was not a creditor pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1602(g) and 15 U.S.C. 1640?
2. Did the District Court err in finding that the Defendant Jason Winer was a "De Facto" car dealer and therefore subject to liability under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
No question identified
Docket Entries
2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-10-01
Waiver of right of respondent Coralys Negron, et al. to respond filed.
2020-09-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 16, 2020)
Attorneys
Coralys Negron, et al.
Daniel S Blinn — Consumer Law Group, Inc., Respondent
Jason Winer
Lauren Hillelee Winer-Beck — Law Offices of Lauren Winer-Beck, Petitioner