No. 20-312
Texas Brine Company, LLC, et al. v. Rodd Naquin, Clerk, Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: appellate-procedure appellate-review due-process geographical-bias judicial-discretion judicial-procedure panel-assignment random-selection state-law
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Securities Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-11-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
The question presented is whether due process requires judges to be assigned to panels randomly from the pool of all the judges available to hear a particular case.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether due process requires judges to be assigned to panels randomly from the pool of all the judges available to hear a particular case
Docket Entries
2020-11-16
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
2020-10-13
Waiver of right of respondent Rodd Naquin to respond filed.
2020-09-25
Waiver of right of respondents Browning Oil Company, Inc., LORCA Corporation, and Colorado Crude Company to respond filed.
2020-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent Reliance Petroleum Corporation to respond filed.
2020-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent Occidental Chemical Corporation, OXY USA Inc and Occidental Petroleum Corporation to respond filed.
2020-09-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Browning Oil Company, Inc., LORCA Corporation, and Colorado Crude Company
Matthew Joseph Randazzo III — Randazzo Giglio & Bailey, Respondent
Legacy Vulcan LLC
Occidental Chemical Corporation, OXY USA Inc and Occidental Petroleum Corporation
Martin A. Stern — Adams and Reese, Respondent
Reliance Petroleum Corporation
Joseph L. Shea Jr. — Bradley Murchison Kelly & Shea LLC, Respondent
Rodd Naquin
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Texas Brine Company LLC, et al.
Paul Whitfield Hughes — McDermott Will & Emery, Petitioner