Is a defendant categorically prohibited from establishing an ineffective assistance of counsel claim under Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010), where he is advised in the plea agreement and during the plea colloquy that he faces the possibility of mandatory removal and states that he seeks to enter a guilty plea regardless of the immigration consequences?

Is a defendant categorically prohibited from establishing an ineffective assistance of counsel claim under Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010), where he is advised in the plea agreement and during the plea colloquy that he faces the possibility of mandatory removal and states that he seeks to enter a guilty plea regardless of the immigration consequences?