No. 20-292
John Pinder v. Scott Crowther, Warden
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-rights conviction criminal-conviction due-process false-testimony federal-courts judicial-review prosecutor-misconduct prosecutorial-misconduct state-courts
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Due Process is violated when a prosecutor relies on false testimony to secure a conviction but did not know that the testimony was false until after trial, as six courts have held, or whether Due Process is violated only where the prosecutor knows the testimony is false at the time of trial, as eight courts have held.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Due Process is violated when a prosecutor relies on false testimony to secure a conviction but did not know that the testimony was false until after trial
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-09-04
Waiver of right of respondent Scott Crowther to respond filed.
2020-09-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 5, 2020)
Attorneys
Pinder John
Andrew Henry Parnes — Law Office of Andrew Parnes, Petitioner
Scott Crowther
Aaron Gregory Murphy — Utah Attorney General, Respondent