Herman Tracy Clark v. Jerold Braggs, Warden
Whether the word "shall " binds the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board
decision that must be pursued in the ordinary mode prescribed by law, to
be adapted to the end to be attained in respect to the justice of the
Governor who has the sole power to grant commutation subject to the
regulations prescribed by law to protect Petitioner 's liberty interest
under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Whether impartiality binds the Pardon and Parole Board is-to preserve
the impartiality of the state and preserve the appearance of the
impartiality of the state in respect to the Petitioner 's interest in the
reason for the Pardon and Parole Board 's decision?
And, do a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 AEDPA restriction also bar grieving the
Government for redress of the Pardon and Parole Board 's commutation
and parole consideration procedure challenging the duration of his
physical imprisonment by way of a 28 U.S.C. § 2241, relief seeking a
determination that entitles immediate release or a speedier release with a
definite sentence?
Whether the word 'shall' binds the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board decision