1. Whether U.S. Government's wrongful possession of a tainted, unlawful void title due to clear violations of federal and Florida laws, including criminal Trespassing, Breaking & Entering, Changing Locks to lock the Barone's out of their home, Destruction of Property and posting unlawful notices on behalf of the government & its agent is acceptable to this High Court?

2. Whether U.S. Government's undeniable exclusive benefit from millions of unlawful foreclosures thru financial agent Fannie Mae, subject it to federal jurisdiction and property "takings" clause of the Constitution?

3. Whether common law, the U.C.C., prior holdings of this Court and the FL Supreme Court prohibit Wells Fargo and third parties from initiating foreclosures when they are not the true owner of the debt owed and therefore have not sustained financial injury?

4. Whether selling and/or pledging millions of homeowners' property as collateral numerous times without consent and disclosure thru RMBS securitizations and rehypothecations of alleged mortgage notes is unlawful, unconstitutional and violate SEC securities laws and NEMO DAT QUOD NON HABET? And whether the alleged mortgages are in fact securities transactions?

5. Whether the appeals court violated Cares Act Sections 4022 & 4024 prohibiting furthering foreclosures and evictions by unfairly dismissing the appeal with prejudice? And whether its false claims of frivolous and threat of sanctions on valid federal claims exclusive to this Supreme Court must be immediately reversed?

Whether the U.S. Government's wrongful possession of a tainted, unlawful void title due to clear violations of federal and Florida laws is acceptable