QUESTION I.
Should a Writ of Prohibition be issued to the 11th Circuit and Joan Lenard, a
federal district court judge in the Southern District of Florida prohibiting
execution of a void, ex parte, fraudulent, extrajudicial $1,700,000
judgment (the "Ex Parte Judgment ") that perpetrates proven crimes,
extortion, fraud on the court and a scheme to defraud
by Respondent, Roy R. Lustig, falling within the definition of a criminal
enterprise wherein Petitioner 's home, life savings and personal property have
been illegally embezzled by Respondent as a result of his own criminal activities
that are irrefutably proven by official, certified Secretary of State records,
affidavits and court filings; and
Should a Writ of Mandamus be issued to the 11th Circuit and to Joan Lenard
requiring them to vacate the extrajudicial Ex Parte Judgment and to order
Respondent to return all assets and property illegally seized from Petitioner.

QUESTION II
Should a Writ of Prohibition be issued to the 11th Circuit and Joan Lenard, a
federal district court judge in the Southern District of Florida prohibiting the
enforcement of an ex parte, extrajudicial, unconstitutional order
(the "Ex Parte Rights Extinguishment Order ") that:
A. Attempts and purports to eviscerate the jurisdiction of this Supreme Court;
B. Extra-judicially and unconstitutionally strips Petitioner and her attorney,
of their fundamental, inalienable Constitutional rights to access any federal
or state court and to sue and defend not only in that judge 's judicial district
but extra-judicially in all other districts, all circuit courts, all state courts,
and all bankruptcy courts throughout the U. S. and in this Supreme Court;
C. Extra-judicially subjects Petitioner and her attorney to life-threatening
danger by prohibiting them from reporting crimes by Respondent and extra-
judicially shields Respondent from his criminal acts; and
Should a Writ of Mandamus also be issued to the 11th Circuit requiring it to
vacate that Ex Parte Rights Extinguishment Order.

QUESTION III
Should a Writ of Prohibition be issued to Laurel Isicoff, a non-Article III
bankruptcy court judge in the Southern District of Florida Bankruptcy Court
prohibiting her jurisdiction-less execution of the Ex Parte Judgment
referenced in Question I by issuing collusive unlawful, void, extrajudicial
orders (the "Extrajudicial Bankruptcy Orders ") to perpetrate Respondent 's
fraudulent claim filed in bankruptcy court using the fraudulent Ex Parte
Judgment (where Petitioner has been forced into an involuntary bankruptcy
as a result of the Ex Parte Judgment); and
Should a Writ of Mandamus be issued requiring Laurel Isicoff to vacate the
Extrajudicial Bankruptcy Orders and requiring her to order Respondent, the
trustee, the attorney for the trustee and all other involved parties to return
Petitioner 's illegally seized life savings, assets and property.

QUESTION IV
Should a Writ of Prohibition be issued prohibiting disqualified Judge Carol
Lisa Phillips, in the 17th Circuit Court in Browar

Should a Writ of Prohibition be issued