1. Can an original decree state, having lost personal and subject matter jurisdiction for purpose of an adoption pursuant to its own state statute, KRS 199.470(1), and in contravention of the PKPA, Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1738A, the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2, the 14th Amendment, the UCCJEA act itself, respective state statutes, and the adoption code of the respective states, use the UCCJEA to deny and usurp the jurisdiction of a sister court who has correctly and statutorily exerted personal and subject matter jurisdiction over an adoption consistent with the mandates under the US Constitution, Article IV, Section 1, under the PKPA, Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1738A (f)(g)(h), the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2, the 14th amendment, the state's codified UCCJEA, and the state's adoption code, and subsequently relitigate a matter previously adjudicated during the adoption, allowing a party to file for a change in custody, sans grounds, during the pendency of an adoption and engage in an abuse of discretion with questionable conduct suggestive of ex-parte communications and preferential treatment denying petitioner's status, previously conferred by the court, and denying petitioner's fundamental rights and due process to participate in a change of custody proceeding?

2. Should this Court reverse and vacate all orders issued from the original decree state beginning with the Sua Sponte order of June 8, 2016 and all subsequent orders and intervening decisions based on lack of jurisdiction, the violation of federal and state statutes and interference with the fundamental rights and due process to the parents both natural and de facto, and misconduct by the judiciary, simultaneously setting aside the order of dismissal of the adoption in the sister state to preserve the proper administration of justice?

Can an original decree state, using the UCCJEA, deny the jurisdiction of a sister state during an adoption proceeding