Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether 8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(l)(B)(ii) —which authorizes the government to detain aliens who are placed in expedited removal proceedings, but who then establish a credible fear of persecution based on a protected ground —violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment because it contains no provision authorizing bond hearings.
2. Whether 8 U.S.C. 1252(f)(1) prohibits lower courts from granting classwide injunctions against the operation of 8 U.S.C. 1221-1232.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 8 U.S.C. authorizes the government to detain aliens who are placed in expedited removal proceedings, but who then establish a credible fear of persecution based on a protected ground—violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment because it contains no provision authorizing bond hearings
2021-01-11
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, 591 U. S. ___ (2020).
2020-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-09
Brief of respondents Yolany Padilla, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-11-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part; the time is extended to and including December 9, 2020.
2020-11-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 23, 2020 to December 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-09-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 23, 2020.
2020-09-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 28, 2020 to November 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-08-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 28, 2020)