No. 20-202

Robert Massie v. Basilea Mena

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-21
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: civil-rights clearly-established-law detention excessive-force fourth-amendment law-enforcement police-conduct qualified-immunity use-of-force
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

(1) Under the particular facts and circumstances
of this case, did the Ninth Circuit err in finding
that Massie's actions constitute an excessive use
of force in violation of the Fourth Amendment?

(2) Regardless of the answer to Number (1), did
the district court and Ninth Circuit nonetheless
err in denying qualified immunity to Massie when
it was not clearly established at the time of the incident (or now) that his actions constituted an excessive use of force in violation of the Fourth
Amendment?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Officer Massie's actions constituted excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-24
Reply of petitioner Robert Massie filed.
2020-11-12
Brief of respondent Basilea Mena in opposition filed.
2020-10-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 20, 2020.
2020-10-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 21, 2020 to November 20, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-09-21
Response Requested. (Due October 21, 2020)
2020-09-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-09-03
Waiver of right of respondent Basilea Mena to respond filed.
2020-08-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 21, 2020)

Attorneys

Basilea Mena
Tillman J. BreckenridgeBreckenridge PLLC, Respondent
William Joseph RisnerRisner & Graham, Respondent
Robert Massie
Dennis Patrick McLaughlinCity of Tucson Attorney's Office, Petitioner