Morgan McCoy v. Michael Bullock, et al.
1. Does pretrial court dismissing prima facie case before its evidence filing deadline constitute R. 103(D) plain error in constitutional violation of due process?
2a. Does Respondent-landlord acquiescing having had surveillance of the small parking area that Petitioner-tenant rents out back of landlord's Belvidere Apartments result with that landlord's resident property manager of said eight tenant building, under O.R.C. 3701. 244(c), understanding or having shouldve understood it more likely than not automobile was Petitioner-tenant's, legally parked and so not to put the cops on tenant about it, and further
2b. Does the White Respondent-landlord acquiescing having had called cops on Petitioner-tenant, the Black man renting landlord's apartment lot, but not the apartment's 'similarly situated' White man, result with that landlord understanding or having should've understood his selective cop calling more likely than not indicative of a disparate treatment and of landlord wanting or expecting tenant be met with armed, dangerous response in violation of 8th Amendment prohibitions against inflicting a cruel distress?
Does pretrial court dismissing prima facie case before its evidence filing deadline constitute R.103(D) plain error in constitutional violation of due process?