No. 20-195
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe v. Tulalip Tribes, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: d-c-circuit indian-tribes judicial-decree judicial-precedent ninth-circuit precedent treaty-fishing-rights treaty-interpretation treaty-rights
Latest Conference:
2020-10-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Ninth Circuit, in conflict with precedent of this Court and the D.C. Circuit, impermissibly narrowed a decades-old judicial decree so as to deprive Indian tribes of their ability to exercise treaty fishing rights.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit impermissibly narrowed a decades-old judicial decree to deprive Indian tribes of treaty fishing rights
Docket Entries
2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-10-07
Reply of petitioner Muckleshoot Indian Tribe filed. (Distributed)
2020-09-18
Waiver of right of respondent Nisqually Indian Tribe to respond filed.
2020-09-18
Brief of respondents Tulalip Tribes, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-08-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 21, 2020)
Attorneys
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
Pratik Arvind Shah — Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, Petitioner
Nisqually Indian Tribe
Jay J. Manning — Cascadia Law Group, Respondent
Tulalip Tribes, et al.
James Miller Jannetta — Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, Respondent