No. 20-189
Robert Barnes v. Bill Stange, Warden
Response Waived
Tags: actual-innocence constitutional-claim cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel gateway-claim habeas
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Missouri courts err in failing to find that Petitioner had established a gate-way claim of actual innocence so that his defaulted constitutional claim could be addressed violating his rights to due process, effective assistance of counsel, and to be free from cruel and unusual punishment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Missouri courts err in failing to find that Petitioner had established a gateway-claim of actual-innocence so that his defaulted constitutional-claim could be addressed, violating his rights to due-process, effective-assistance-of-counsel, and to be free from cruel-and-unusual-punishment?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-21
Waiver of right of respondent Bill Stange, Warden to respond filed.
2020-08-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 18, 2020)
Attorneys
Bill Stange, Warden
Julie Marie Blake — Missouri Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Robert Barnes
Kevin Louis Schriener — Law & Schriener, LLC, Petitioner