No. 20-182
Rita Stanback, et al. v. Ginny Humphrey, as Parent and Legal Guardian of Minor Child, O. H., et al.
Tags: civil-rights clearly-established-law due-process law-enforcement police-investigation qualified-immunity sexual-misconduct sixth-circuit supervisory-liability takings
Latest Conference:
2020-10-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Sixth Circuit contradicted a fundamental principle of this Court's qualified immunity precedent when it denied qualified immunity to Petitioners on the grounds that their challenged conduct violated clearly established law and premised its determination solely upon cases that were decided after Petitioners' challenged conduct?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Circuit contradicted a fundamental principle of this Court's qualified immunity precedent
Docket Entries
2020-10-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
2020-08-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 18, 2020)
Attorneys
Rita Stanback, et al.
Edward J. McKenney Jr. — Harris Shelton Hanover Walsh, PLLC, Petitioner