No. 20-1815

Dale J. Richardson v. United States District Court for the District of Colorado

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-06-29
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-court-procedure habeas-corpus immigration-court judicial-suspension obstruction-of-justice torture torture-prevention
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

Is it constitutional to leave a person in the custody of someone they alleged torture against?

Is it constitutional to use a grievance policy to obstructed justice?

Is it constitutional to expect perfect compliance with the rules for a pro se habeas corpus application who is being tortured and obstructed?

Is it constitutional to use the rules of the Court to justify torture?

If no exceptional circumstances be used to justify torture, can the rules of the court be used to justify torture?

Is it constitutional to use the rules of the Court to obstruct justice?

Is it constitutional to detain a person under any law that is not criminal law?

Is it constitutional for a person or persons to be deprived of life, liberty, or property by IMMIGRATION COURT when the same is not part of the UNITED STATES judicial branch responsible for the due process of law?

Given the common law nature of the Privilege of Writ of Habeas Corpus, does a corrupt court constitute a suspension of the Privilege of Writ of Habeas Corpus for person or persons held within its jurisdiction?

Is suspending the Privilege of Writ of Habeas Corpus for any reason and by any means not permitted by the United States Constitution an act of treason or the invariable pursuit of the Object?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is it constitutional to leave a person in the custody of someone they alleged torture against?

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-06-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due July 29, 2021)

Attorneys

Dale J. Richardson
Dale J. Richardson — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent