Whether, under the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), respondent-chancellor abused her discretion in applying the Tennessee Uniform Arbitration Act ("the Act") when the FAA was expressly mandated by petitioner's Employment Agreement as drafted by counsel for appellee-respondent, providing for a clear and established legal right to be enforced in petitioner's filed application for the purpose of seeking vacatur of his arbitration award under the FAA as opposed to the Act.

Whether the FAA preempts the Tennessee Uniform Arbitration Act