Whether fraudulent misrepresentation and conspiracy to defraud are preempted, when the Educational federal statutes touch a field in which the federal interest is so dominant, that the federal system must be assumed to preclude enforcement of state laws and the District Court should have granted the petition and pleading pursuant to 28 U.S. Code §1367 Supplemental jurisdiction under Article III of the United States Constitution for claims and evidences that are inextricably intertwined/intricately related.

Whether the District Court was biased to dismiss the case pertinent to claim on prior ruling that the court remanded the case because the court had not ruled on State Criminal removal in 15 years, and violated the Equal Protection Clause, by failure to grant Equitable relief and restore substantial loss and impairment of freedoms of expression and speech, rights under the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments and due process clause to the Constitution of the United States of America.

Whether fraudulent misrepresentation and conspiracy-to-defraud are preempted