No. 20-1772
Branden Edward Shumate v. California
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: attorney-client-relationship attorney-of-choice criminal-defendant criminal-procedure motion-for-new-trial post-conviction-proceedings right-to-counsel sentencing sixth-amendment trial-court
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether a Trial Court Deprives a Defendant of His Right to Counsel by Discharging a Defendant's Hired Attorney of Choice Just Before Trial Was to Start
II. Whether a Trial Court Deprives a Criminal Defendant of His Right to Retained Counsel of Choice at His Motion for New Trial and/or Sentencing
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-a-trial-court-deprives-a-defendant-of-his-right-to-counsel
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-08
Waiver of right of respondent State of California to respond filed.
2021-06-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 22, 2021)
Attorneys
Branden Shumate
Rose Fay Arfa — Fay Arfa, A Law Corporation, Petitioner
State of California
Annie Featherman Fraser — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent