No. 20-1767
Sarasota Wine Market, LLC, et al. v. Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General of Missouri, et al.
Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: commerce-clause nondiscrimination nondiscrimination-principle online-market physical-presence regulatory-interests state-regulation twenty-first-amendment wine-retailers
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
When considering both the Twenty-first Amendment and the Commerce Clause, may Missouri ban out-of-state wine retailers from participating in its online market when nondiscriminatory alternatives are available that would serve its regulatory interests?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Missouri's law prohibiting out-of-state wine retailers from participating in its online market violates the Commerce Clause despite the Twenty-first Amendment
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-13
Waiver of the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed.
2021-09-10
Brief of respondents Eric Schmitt, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-08-11
Response Requested. (Due September 10, 2021)
2021-07-21
Brief amici curiae of 22 Wine Consumers filed. (Distributed)
2021-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-14
Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Wine Retailers filed. (Distributed)
2021-07-01
Waiver of right of respondents Eric Schmitt, et al. to respond filed.
2021-06-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 21, 2021)
Attorneys
22 Wine Consumers as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners
Eric Schmitt, et al.
D. John Sauer — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
National Association of Wine Retailers
Sean M. O'Leary — O'Leary Law and Policy Gr, Amicus
Sarasota Wine Market, LLC, et al.
James Alexander Tanford — Epstein Cohen Seif & Porter LLP, Petitioner